Well Grover, I think, you’ve got your man. The truth about the real strategy coming from the right-wing is becoming more and more obvious for all of America to see. Grover Norquist gave a speech back in February of this year at the CPAC gathering in Washington, DC. This is what he had to say:
“All we have to do is replace Obama. … We are not auditioning for fearless leader. We don’t need a president to tell us in what direction to go. We know what direction to go. We want the Ryan budget. … We just need a president to sign this stuff. We don’t need someone to think it up or design it. The leadership now for the modern conservative movement for the next 20 years will be coming out of the House and the Senate. […]
Pick a Republican with enough working digits to handle a pen to become president of the United States. This is a change for Republicans: the House and Senate doing the work with the president signing bills. His job is to be captain of the team, to sign the legislation that has already been prepared.”
Well, as they say, you need to be careful what you ask for. Let’s go back to January 20, 2009.
They, your party members and some of it’s backers, put their nefarious plot together on the day President Obama was inaugurated. That meeting at the Caucus Club in Washington DC, was designed to put into motion a plan to attempt to gain control of the House of Representatives (which they did) and the Senate. To gain control of as many State House’s and Legislatures as they could (they were marginally successful with that), obstruct the President at every turn, and use whatever successes they had at the state level to suppress the President’s support.
Your guys used a jobs meme at both national and local levels, in the mid-term elections of 2010, to gain control. Your group co-opted the tea-party groups as part of your plan, coincidentally, a group whose enmity for the president is matched only by [your groups] enmity for them, and immediately pivoted away from the jobs promise, which would have helped the country and by extension the President, distracted the entire country with an assault on what had been accepted social norms, and then, set about using every tactic they could to suppress the vote.
Then came the primaries and you, and your cohort’s, in spite of the more qualified available party members (Tim Pawlenty, Rob Portman, Jon Huntsman and Jeb Bush), Mitt Romney became the party’s choice. But lets think about that. You didn’t pick Mitt because of his intelligence, you picked him because of his statuesque stance. You didn’t pick Mitt for his time as CEO of Bain, you picked him in spite of it. You didn’t pick Mitt because of his plan for America, you actually picked him because he didn’t have a workable plan. You didn’t pick him because of his positions on the issues, you picked him because of his many different positions on the same issues. This election wasn’t supposed to be about him anyway.
All you wanted from him was “enough working digits to handle a pen.”
Then, the “Mitt” hit the fan.
In the month since the Republican National Convention, the campaign has almost completely come off it’s rails. Beginning at the convention itself, except for the final night, your candidate was pretty much a prime-time afterthought. Even on that thursday night, Mitt found himself upstaged by Clint Eastwood and a chair. Your convention was, then, upstaged a week later by what, the concensus says, was a very successful convention by the Democrat’s.
The next week, the “October surprise” came early, and a possible chance at redemption presented itself. The attack on the consulate in Lybia (with the assassination of Ambassador Stevens), and the uprising spreading from Egypt and middle-east, gave Mitt and the party, an opportunity show America, and the world, how you would handle yourselves in a crisis. Well that didn’t work out very well. Mitt’s planned, but premature, attack on the president, based on what was found to be incorrect information, was a complete fail.
Then just as you were starting yet another reinvention of your candidate, this video of Mitt, speaking so casually and with such disdain, about half of our population was revealed. Really Mitt? 47%?
What you now have is a candidate that is trailing in virtually every demographic, in virtually every poll. Down ticket candidates are abandoning Mitt left and right. Right-wing pundits are assailing Mitt, questioning whether he is up to the task of unseating President Obama. The answers I’m hearing from them do not show a lot of confidence. But Grover, you got what you asked for.
As for you, Mitt my man, you’ve been played. You were at the CPAC weren’t you? Didn’t you hear what Rick Santorum had to say? “Money will not defeat Barack Obama, ideas will.” Didn’t you hear what Grover Norquist had to say, about those digits?
Well Grover (can I call you “Grove”), there’s one thing you, and your buddies, can say, when you sit around the Caucus Club and talk about the mess you, and your party, find yourselves in.
YOU DID BUILD THAT!
- Quote of the Day: Grover Norquist says Romney will do what a Republican Congress says to do… (underthelobsterscope.wordpress.com)
- @GroverNorquist is a Weenie, Dear (madmonq.wordpress.com)
- Denying Entitlements To The Wealthy (catsnjammer64.wordpress.com)
- Frank Gaffney Plotting To Take Down Grover Norquist With Muslim Brotherhood Accusations (tribuneofthepeople.com)
- Prominent Conservative Plots To Take Down Grover Norquist (huffingtonpost.com)
This design is spectacular! You most certainly know how to keep a reader amused.
Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to
start my own blog (well, almost…HaHa!) Fantastic job.
I really enjoyed what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it.